Depositors’ discipline, banks’ accounting discretion, and depositors’ expectations of implicit government guarantees

Michael L. McIntyre () and Yinlin Zhang ()
Additional contact information
Michael L. McIntyre: Carleton University
Yinlin Zhang: Carleton University

Journal of Banking Regulation, 2020, vol. 21, issue 3, No 5, 256-277

Abstract: Abstract In this study, we examine the depositors’ tendency to apply financial discipline to banks that adopt discretionary accounting practices. We use estimates of discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLP)—the difference between an observed provision and a model-determined, notionally correct provision—to quantify the extent to which banks are engaging in discretionary accounting practices. We examine whether depositors perceive that discretionary accounting practices increase credit risk and punish such practices by withdrawing deposits or requiring higher interest rates. We also examine whether depositors’ expectations of implicit government guarantee moderate this relationship by comparing the differences in depositors’ responses depending on whether a bank is large or small. Using US commercial bank data from 2001Q1 to 2010Q4, we find that uninsured deposit growth is negatively associated with banks’ DLLP. The findings suggest that depositors punish banks’ discretionary accounting practices. We also find that within the non-too-big-to-fail (non-TBTF) banks, depositors react sensitively to DLLP practices during both the crisis and non-crisis periods. However, for those too-big-to-fail (TBTF) banks, depositors react sensitively to DLLP practices only during the non-crisis period, but not during the crisis period. In addition, we find that banks subject to US government bailout actions during the 2008–2009 crisis period received less depositor discipline than other banks. In general, our findings suggest that the uninsured depositors’ discipline did exist during the pre-crisis period. Depositors punish banks for their behavior in increasing the information asymmetry between the banks and outsider creditors. However, policies such as rescuing big banks or increasing the deposit insurance coverage may reduce such market discipline.

Keywords: Accounting discretion; Loan loss provisioning; Banks; Market discipline; Uninsured depositors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G21 G32 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41261-019-00110-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1057_s41261-019-00110-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41261/PS2

DOI: 10.1057/s41261-019-00110-3

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking Regulation is currently edited by Dalvinder Singh

More articles in Journal of Banking Regulation from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().