The Presuppositions of NLP
Paul Tosey and
Jane Mathison
Additional contact information
Paul Tosey: University of Surrey
Jane Mathison: University of Surrey
Chapter 9 in Neuro-Linguistic Programming, 2009, pp 97-110 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract Two common questions asked about NLP are, does it have any theory; and what is distinctive about it? Many NLP practitioners would probably agree with McDermott & O’Connor, that ‘the root of NLP’s individuality lies in its presuppositions’ (1996:58).1 What are these and where did they originate? Do they indicate that NLP has any theoretical basis?
Keywords: Logical Type; Cybernetic System; Requisite Variety; Logical Derivation; Information Processing Activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-24831-1_9
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230248311
DOI: 10.1057/9780230248311_9
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).