Introduction: Competing Assessments of Alfred Marshall’s Economics

Neil Hart

Chapter 1 in Equilibrium and Evolution, 2012, pp 1-13 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This book re-examines the theoretical debates and controversies that characterised the 1920s, which Paul Samuelson has highlighted as being decisive to the development of economic analysis in the decades that followed. In these debates, attention was focused on what is now often referred to as Alfred Marshall’s ‘reconciliation problem’, characterised as the attempt to construct supply schedules under conditions of pure competition in the presence of increasing returns to scale. A solution to this dilemma was thought necessary in order to legitimise the partial equilibrium analysis of markets founded on demand and supply functions. It was generally concluded that Marshall’s attempts to resolve the ‘reconciliation problem’ had not only been unsuccessful but had also, as Mark Blaug (1962: 399) summarised, ‘raised false problems that took the best efforts of a generation of economists to solve’.

Keywords: Evolutionary Thinking; Pure Competition; Filial Obligation; Handy Tool; Partial Equilibrium Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-36117-1_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230361171

DOI: 10.1057/9780230361171_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().