Is Empowerment Ethical? Why Ask the Question?

John J. Quinn

Chapter 2 in Ethics and Empowerment, 1999, pp 23-37 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Empowerment is desirable, is it not? Almost by definition, the idea that people may have greater power over some aspects of their own lives seems to be a good thing. And in the majority of areas where the term is used — for example, feminism, consumerism and urban planning — this is generally the position taken. Even where the activity involved might be socially or otherwise undesirable, empowerment might be seen as positive if misdirected. Thus we are told of the 18th Street Gang in Los Angeles ‘[Gang members] taught kids who came from other countries how to survive…18th Street empowered a lot of kids [telling them] “This is how you do it in America”’ (Observer, 24 November 1996). In the emergent debate on communitarianism, empowerment would appear to be a necessary prerequisite if individuals are to take more responsibility for shaping their own lives and the lives of those around them.

Keywords: Business Ethic; Total Quality Management; Gang Member; Employment Protection Legislation; Buffer Stock (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37272-6_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230372726

DOI: 10.1057/9780230372726_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().