Contributions and Controversies, 1922 to 1990

Warren Young and Frederic Lee
Additional contact information
Warren Young: Deakin University

Chapter 8 in Oxford Economics and Oxford Economists, 1993, pp 186-208 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The contributions of the generations of Oxford economists of the prewar (1922 to 1939), wartime (1940 to 1945), and post-war (1946 onwards) periods were significant, highly original and many times critical of neoclassical theory. And, as in the case of such work, these contributions were accompanied by debate both within the economics profession and amongst Oxford economists themselves. In order to do justice to the overall scope of Oxford economics during these periods, we will not limit ourselves only to the contributions that engendered critical debate among ‘mainstream’ economists. Indeed, some of the most interesting and thought-provoking work at Oxford also took place in what can be called the ‘non-mainstream’ and ‘heterodox’ areas of economic inquiry, conducted by individuals who ranged from formally-trained or self-taught economists, in most cases, to in one instance at least, an influential — albeit somewhat forgotten — ‘monetary crank’. This demarcation follows from the eclectic and path-breaking tradition that characterised Oxford economics and economists of these periods. Indeed, even up to the time of his death, Hicks was working on what he called a new approach to markets and money. Thus Sayers’s comment on the interwar Oxford economists is also appropriate for the Oxford economists of the post-war era as well: In the second of the inter-war decades Oxford had at least its fair share of the rising generation of English economists … These economists in no sense formed a ‘school of thought:’ they were drawn from surprisingly varied sources and had scarcely had time to do more than understand and explain work originating in the older homes of economic thought. But to suppose that they were content to find illumination in traditional doctrine would be a grave injustice: they were also keenly interested in putting traditional doctrine to the test of practical experience and in arriving at practical maxims for economic policy.1

Keywords: Interest Rate; Profit Margin; Full Cost; Cost Price; Price Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37437-9_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230374379

DOI: 10.1057/9780230374379_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().