Markets, Policies, and Trade Rules in Crisis: 1979–86

Timothy E. Josling, Stefan Tangermann and T. K. Warley
Additional contact information
Timothy E. Josling: Stanford University
Stefan Tangermann: University of Göttingen
T. K. Warley: University of Guelph

Chapter 6 in Agriculture in the GATT, 1996, pp 101-132 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract As the Tokyo Round was concluded and the 1970s drew to a close, it was clear that the GATT system was still weak in the area of agricultural trade. Domestic agricultural policies were hardly constrained at all by international disciplines, and conditions in international trade were dominated by the influence of these national farm programmes. A large number of agricultural trade disputes were brought before the GATT, and even though most of these disputes were settled in a legal sense, these settlements did not have much of an effect on the way government policies impinged on trade flows. The situation had hardly improved at all since the inception of the GATT thirty years before.

Keywords: Trade Rule; Uruguay Round; Export Subsidy; Agricultural Trade; Equitable Share (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37890-2_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230378902

DOI: 10.1057/9780230378902_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().