Managing Legacy

Richard Cashman and John Horne

Chapter 4 in Managing the Olympics, 2013, pp 50-65 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter will review legacy-management processes that have emerged in the last decade and comment on their effectiveness. Because legacy-management processes are still evolving and there remain gaps, loose ends and shortcomings in protocols and procedures, it will be argued that legacy management is still evolving. Indeed, it is a more difficult exercise than the management of the Games as an event. The following issues will be considered: The diffuse character and variety of legacy objectives; The problem of legacy assessment and its time frame; Legacy governance; The monitoring of legacy by an Olympic city and the IOC; The policing of legacy; Research into legacy management.

Keywords: Sport Participation; Olympic Game; Positive Legacy; Host City; Great London Authority (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-38958-8_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230389588

DOI: 10.1057/9780230389588_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().