Conclusion and Working Hypothesis Rethought

Tim Sauber and Hugo Tschirky

Chapter 7 in Structured Creativity, 2006, pp 199-202 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract In the previous chapter, it was presented that innovation architecture and the innovation strategy formulation process is highly accepted by management practice. However, it has still to be evaluated whether the innovation strategy formulation process is in alignment with the theoretical requirements of Chapter 4. This evaluation of the concept is shown in Figure 7.1 and described in the following.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-51324-2_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230513242

DOI: 10.1057/9780230513242_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().