Russia
Anatoly Peresetsky and
Vladimir Popov
Chapter 8 in Macroeconomic Volatility, Institutions and Financial Architectures, 2008, pp 190-219 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract Would a particular country be willing to reduce volatility at the expense of lowering the long-term growth rate if there were a trade-off between volatility and growth? Fortunately, there is no such trade-off. As many studies have documented (see Aghion et al., 2004 for a recent survey of the literature) the relationship between volatility and growth is negative, that is, rapid growth is associated with lower volatility. This result holds if one compares fast- and slow-growing countries, as well as periods of fast and slow growth/recession in the same country. So, policies to promote growth, if successful, are likely to reduce volatility as well, even though the mechanism of such a spin-off is not well understood. Nevertheless, the volatility of macro variables cannot be totally explained by their growth rates: even when controlling for the average speed of change, there remain huge variations in volatility in various countries and periods.
Keywords: Real Exchange Rate; Money Supply; Private Capital; External Shock; Macroeconomic Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59018-2_8
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230590182
DOI: 10.1057/9780230590182_8
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().