Institutionalizing Proactive Sustainability Standards in Supply Chains: Which Institutional Entrepreneurship Capabilities Matter?

Jörg H. Grimm, Joerg S. Hofstetter, Martina Müggler and Nils J. Peters
Additional contact information
Jörg H. Grimm: University of St. Gallen
Joerg S. Hofstetter: University of St. Gallen
Martina Müggler: University of St. Gallen
Nils J. Peters: McKinsey & Company in Zurich

Chapter Chapter Ten in Cross-Sector Leadership for the Green Economy, 2011, pp 177-193 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract External stakeholders have built up sustainability consciousness and expectations, putting companies under regular surveillance by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and by the media (Doh & Guay, 2006). Stakeholders often do not differentiate between a company’s operations and its suppliers’ operations; they hold the company responsible for all practices involved in the making of the product, including any potential sustainability concerns (Rao, 2002). Thus, suppliers not complying with the company’s promised values are likely to damage corporate reputation or harm customer confidence. Levi’s, Nike, and Mattel are prominent examples that show how brands can suffer as a result of using noncompliant suppliers (Wagner, Lutz, & Weitz, 2009). A proactive supply chain sustainability strategy is therefore vital (Handfield, Scroufe, & Walton 2005; Rao & Holt, 2005). To implement such a strategy, companies provide specific sustainability standards for their supply chains (Bansal & Hunter, 2003; Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006). These standards, known as proactive supply chain sustainability standards (PSCSS) may provide statements to comply with legal requirements and may add elements that go beyond the law. Having introduced these PSCSS, companies still face the challenge of ensuring that their supply chain partners comply. Monitoring supplier processes and assessing the quality of procured products is challenging, because global supply chains have become more complex (Matten & Moon, 2008; Roth, Tsay, Pullman, & Gray, 2008). The large number of suppliers, as well as the organizational and geographical distance between the company and its direct and indirect suppliers, hinder a company from controlling its suppliers’ sustainability practices (Bremer & Udovich, 2001). Further problems may arise when suppliers are located in developing countries, as local legal standards may not conform to the main company’s requirements (Detomasi, 2007).

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Supply Chain; Strategic Management Journal; Sustainability Practice; Green Supply Chain Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-01589-1_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137015891

DOI: 10.1057/9781137015891_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().