Evaluation: Applying Yardsticks

Susan Corby and Pete Burgess
Additional contact information
Susan Corby: University of Greenwich
Pete Burgess: University of Greenwich

Chapter 13 in Adjudicating Employment Rights, 2014, pp 206-226 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This final chapter seeks to evaluate the adjudicatory regimes that have been described in the previous ten chapters, assessing them against a range of yardsticks. We approach this chapter tentatively for a number of reasons. First, and notwithstanding our efforts to compare and contrast institutional features using comparative models in Chapter 2, comparisons remain fraught with difficulty as we noted in our introductory chapter, principally because comparison invariably entails some lifting of institutions out of context, ignoring the fact that a country’s institutions reflect its context and history, as well as the political hue and public policy concerns of the country’s government of the day. As such, the yardsticks against which institutions and procedures are evaluated may only be partly commensurable.

Keywords: Procedural Justice; Legal Representation; Legal Formality; Appellate Court; Civil Court (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-26920-1_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137269201

DOI: 10.1057/9781137269201_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().