Bargaining Positions of the Parties to a Transit Pipeline: Four Case Studies

Ekpen James Omonbude

Chapter 4 in Cross-border Oil and Gas Pipelines and the Role of the Transit Country: Economics, Challenges, and Solutions, 2013, pp 57-100 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter analyses the factors that influenced the transit fee agreements for the four main pipeline projects examined in this research. Specifically (and more importantly) it looks at factors that affected the bargaining positions of the parties involved in the pipeline agreements. The projects discussed in this chapter are the Baku—Tbilisi—Ceyhan oil pipeline, the Chad—Cameroon oil pipeline, the West African gas pipeline project, and the Shah Deniz gas pipeline project.

Keywords: Bargaining Power; Bargaining Position; Transit Country; Energy Information Administration; Transit Route (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-27452-6_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137274526

DOI: 10.1057/9781137274526_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().