The Economic Effects of Land Redistribution: The Case of a Community-Based Rural Land Development Project in Malawi

Franklin Simtowe, Mariapia Mendola, Julius Mangisoni, Hardwick Tchale and Clement Nyirongo
Additional contact information
Julius Mangisoni: Lilongwe University
Hardwick Tchale: World Bank based in Freetown
Clement Nyirongo: Malawi Civil Service

Chapter 5 in Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa, 2013, pp 105-133 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Land reform in countries with high levels of land inequality is seen by most development experts as an effective means of reducing poverty, since land enriches the asset portfolio of poor households (HHs) and carries with it the potential for agricultural production and entrepreneurship. The objectives of land redistribution are largely classified into (i) social, (ii) economic (iii) political and (iv) environmental. As expressed by Binswanger et al. (2009), advocates of social land reform expect little overall economic gain from the reform, but see it as a way to provide some security and subsistence to a large unemployed rural labor force. To them, the main thrust of agricultural development is to come from large-scale farms and the supporting agro-industrial sectors. The advocates of economic land reform stress the productive superiority of family farms; and they expect the land reform to make a significant contribution not only to agricultural production, but also to rural employment, self-employment, and poverty reduction. The arguments in favor of economic land reform presented above are also consistent with the economic theory which states that a one-time egalitarian distribution of assets in an environment of imperfect markets is associated with permanent higher levels of growth (Deininger et al., 1999). Consistent with this notion, Aghion et al. (1999) express the fact that redistribution in an economy can be conducive to growth. Furthermore, cross-country regressions (Birdsall and Londono, 1998; World Bank, 2001) also provide evidence that greater inequality in the distribution of assets such as land is associated with lower subsequent growth.

Keywords: Propensity Score; Average Treatment Effect; Land Reform; Land Policy; International Development Association (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-34381-9_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137343819

DOI: 10.1057/9781137343819_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().