 Efficiency Wages, X-Efficiency, and Urban UnemploymentHarvey Leibenstein
Chapter 8 in Economic Development and Planning, 1974, pp 168-185 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract There is a basic asymmetry between returns to human and non human inputs. The essence of the asymmetry is that the wage can affect the efficiency of labour while the return to the owners of non human inputs, such as machines, buildings, or land, has no influence on the inputs’ physical contributions. This distinction has a number of implications — some of which will be examined in this paper. The implication to be considered is the possibility that the effect of the rate of return of an input, on efficiency, may imply a lower boundary below which the return to the input owner cannot go, and as a consequence this limits the effectiveness of such a variable as a means of clearing a market. For instance, if there is a minimum wage then it is possible for that labour market never to come into ‘equilibrium’ because the wage cannot get low enough to equate the demand and supply for labour. This is similar to the idea of the liquidity trap when there is a floor to the interest rate. ‘Efficiency wages’ can operate in a similar manner. Keywords: Minimum Wage; Wage Rate; Real Wage; High Wage; Wage Level (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-01933-5_8 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01933-5_8 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.