 O’Brien’s ‘The Evolution of the Theory of the Firm’: a DiscussionScott Moss Chapter 3 in Firms, Organization and Labour, 1984, pp 63-68 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract The argument put forward by O’Brien is that the inductive, empirical strand in the work of Alfred Marshall has been dropped from economic analyses of the firm in favour of an abstract theory of the firm with no empirical content and no empirical referent. Perhaps, the major deficiency of the established theory of the firm is that it ignores the nature of, and requirements for, information available to decision-makers within firms and, in general, it leaves no role for entrepreneurship. O’Brien follows Latsis in preferring the behavioural theories of the firm over the established, neoclassical theory precisely because information (or the lack of it) is important and because it gives pride of place to managerial strengths, weaknesses and ‘the broad faculties of judgement, promptness, resource, carefulness and steadfastness of purpose’ which Marshall suggested were required of the successful entrepreneur. In addition, O’Brien recognizes that the behavioural theories offer far less precise and general predictions than the neo-classical theories. Keywords: Cost Curve; Neoclassical Theory; Established Theory; Representative Firm; Logical Coherence (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-06663-6_3 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-06663-6_3 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.