Conclusion

Eva Etzioni-Halevy
Additional contact information
Eva Etzioni-Halevy: The Australian National University

A chapter in National Broadcasting Under Siege, 1987, pp 204-212 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The main conclusion reached on the basis of this study is that by and large the general theses presented at the outset have found empirical support in all the countries studied, but the hypothesis that was meant to differentiate among the countries is supported only in part. In line with the general theses, there is, in all four countries, legal and normative ambiguity with regard to the independence and impartiality of broadcasting; in all four countries, considerable political pressures bear down from politicians on broadcasting corporations and from those corporation’s top echelons on their staff; in all four countries this calls forth resistance and, at least intermittent, tension and conflict.

Keywords: Political Pressure; Broadcasting System; Public Broadcasting; Conclusion Conclusion; Democratic Rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-09077-8_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349090778

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-09077-8_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().