Introduction

David Reisman

Chapter 1 in The Political Economy of James Buchanan, 1990, pp 1-6 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract James Buchanan, reflecting on the state of economic science as it was at the time when he was awarded the Nobel Prize in that subject, was capable of branding much of the work of his colleagues and contemporaries as little more than a waste of resources: As it is practiced in the 1980s, economics is a ‘science’ without ultimate purpose or meaning. It has allowed itself to become captive of the technical tools that it employs without keeping track of just what it is that the tools are to be used for. In a very real sense, the economists of the 1980s are illiterate in basic principles of their own discipline … Their motivation is not normative; they seem to be ideological eunuchs. Their interest lies in the purely intellectual properties of the models with which they work, and they seem to get their kicks from the discovery of proofs of propositions relevant only for their own fantasy lands … I do deplore the waste that such investment of human capital reflects.1

Keywords: Public Choice; Economic Science; Public Choice Theory; Constitutional Political Economy; Federalist Paper (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-10519-9_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349105199

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-10519-9_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().