Value Systems
Norman Barry
Chapter 2 in Business Ethics, 1998, pp 17-36 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract In ethical theory there are, to simplify matters, two competing approaches to the evaluation of conduct, whether it is the behaviour of politicians, ordinary people in their daily lives, or business (either the appraisal of the whole system or actions of individual agents operating under its rules); they are the teleological and the deontological.1 These apparently irreconcilable value systems colour, in one form or other, all of our moral judgements. Briefly, teleological judgements are based upon some desirable state of affairs, either for an individual or a group, which some action brings about; and the action is evaluated in accord-ance with its conduciveness to this wanted outcome. It is states of affairs themselves that are intrinsically valuable rather than the moral quality of the actions that bring them about. In contrast, deontological principles relate to those moral duties that restrain us from performing certain actions irrespective of the value of consequences. The duties themselves are intrinsically compelling.
Keywords: Business Ethic; Security Market; Moral Rule; Inside Trading; Pareto Principle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-12386-5_2
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349123865
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-12386-5_2
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().