‘Realism’ in Policy Espousal

Clarence Philbrook

Chapter 5 in What do Economists Contribute?, 1999, pp 69-86 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Economists in general have learned to live under the recurring charge that they are ‘unrealistic’. The term may, of course, mean many things. Where the meaning applies to what they do strictly as ‘scientists,’ the barbs need not go deep. Against such slings and arrows there hangs ready a familiar armor — namely, the prestige of scientific method, made magically tough by having clothed also those heroes of the battle for knowledge, the natural scientists. Not always are economists content, however, to remain ‘scientists’ describing relationships and eschewing reference to the desirability of things, or even to remain ‘engineers’ suggesting devices to achieve ends laid before them entirely by others. They do step out of these rôles and give their society, or some sector of it, advice which commits the adviser to responsibility for value judgments.2 They do ‘take positions’ and act as advisers in a full sense. In this rôle too they are often faced with the charge of being ‘unrealistic’.

Keywords: Idea Force; Mutual Consistency; Deterministic Position; Mutual Exclusiveness; Economist Content (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-14913-1_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349149131

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-14913-1_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().