Perceived usefulness and effectiveness of a MOOC on healthcare during the pandemic

José Miguel Padilha (), Celeste Bastos, Francisco Vieira (), Paulo Machado, Ana Leonor Ribeiro, Pedro Cabral and Margarida Abreu
Additional contact information
José Miguel Padilha: Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto
Celeste Bastos: Center for Health Technology and Services Research - CINTESIS@RISE
Francisco Vieira: Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto
Paulo Machado: Center for Health Technology and Services Research - CINTESIS@RISE
Ana Leonor Ribeiro: Center for Health Technology and Services Research - CINTESIS@RISE
Pedro Cabral: Unidade de Computação Científica
Margarida Abreu: Center for Health Technology and Services Research - CINTESIS@RISE

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-9

Abstract: Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant constraints to healthcare professionals in accessing evidence-based and certified education. This has highlighted the need for massive open online courses (MOOCs), considering their flexibility in digital access and time management. This study aimed to assess the intention of healthcare professionals to use a MOOC in lifelong learning during a pandemic outbreak and its effectiveness in knowledge retention. A descriptive study was conducted involving 2629 participants enrolled in a COVID-19-related open-access MOOC who agreed to participate in this study. A validated questionnaire was applied to collect the data. Data were processed and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study revealed the existence of certified trainees and non-certified explorers. The MOOC was useful to the healthcare professionals’ lifelong training (mean of 4.4 in 5) and perceived ease of use (mean of 4.4 in 5), with most professionals intending to continue using lifelong training (mean of 4.4 in 5). Moreover, participants reported high levels of satisfaction (4.5 in 5). The analysis of the mean score of the initial and final assessment per participant showed statistically significant differences (t795 = 58.5; P

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05057-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05057-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05057-7

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().