Capitalism and Freedom in Pre-modern Thought

Philipp Robinson Rössner ()
Additional contact information
Philipp Robinson Rössner: University of Manchester

Chapter Chapter 5 in Freedom and Capitalism in Early Modern Europe, 2020, pp 109-128 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter studies the somewhat darker origins of liberalism by situating continental economic literature during the age of capitalism’s ascendancy (1450s–1850s) within the idiosyncratic conditions provided on the ground in early modern Europe. Most European regions, as seen in Chapter 4 , remained decidedly agrarian and non-urban, shot-through with feudal systems of allocation, modes of production and forms of extraction which created a very specific institutional framework for individual economic activity. Individual freedom (or the absence of it) was embedded within social networks and feudal webs of power, coercion. With native nobilities and feudal grand seigneurs enjoying wide-ranging claims on the economic, social and emotional resources of the individual, numerous freedoms in the plural infringed on concepts of possessive individualism and competitive laissez-faire which shaped during that time and which became important for the unfolding of capitalism. Early modern economic writers, in this process, framed and re-framed the question of freedoms in the plural, especially the privileges enjoyed by the nobility and other market infringements, when making their dynamic models of economy work. Conditions for capitalism and competitive markets—economic freedom in the modern way—had to be created from scratch, designed and managed. They could not be found, or assumed (as much of the modern literature does) to just exist in situ, or continue to exist automatically once established. Capitalism and freedom needed careful management. Whilst societal premises were different, conclusions reached by Cameralists such as Johann Heinrich Justi or, in Scotland, Sir James Steuart, about markets and price formation were surprisingly often very similar to those used to the present day. Thus, we have, in Cameralism and mercantilism, yet another origin point for modern ideologies regarding the nature and role of markets, especially in terms of their positive connotation for capitalism and economic development.

Keywords: J.S. Mill; Cameralism; Machiavelli; Feudalism; Liberalism; Freedom (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palscp:978-3-030-53309-0_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030533090

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53309-0_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in Economic History from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().