 Risk Management Competency Development Indicators: Differing Importance Across DemographicsEric H. Y. Koh ()
Chapter Chapter 3 in Risk Management Competency Development in Banks, 2019, pp 33-46 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract This chapter seeks to address the second objective. It seeks to assess whether the importance attached to the indicators significantly differs across the three demographic groups of banks, namely, (1) local- versus foreign-controlled banks, (2) entrepreneur- versus non-entrepreneur-controlled banks and (3) different staff seniority levels. These findings may help guide managers and regulatory authorities to a better understanding of the different emphases which these banks may have. The findings are based on a survey analysis of 135 risk management practitioners. The responses sought are measured on a five-point Likert scale with a score of ‘1’ being effectively ‘not a great deal’ and ‘5’ being ‘to a great extent’. The survey questionnaire was in turn developed based on the operationalized risk management indicators identified in Chap. 2 . The questionnaire is shown in Appendix. Keywords: Demographic groups; Survey; Likert scale (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pmschp:978-981-13-7599-6_3 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-7599-6_3 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.