The Full Financial Toolkit of Partial Second Moments
James Ming Chen
Additional contact information
James Ming Chen: Michigan State University
Chapter Chapter 5 in Postmodern Portfolio Theory, 2016, pp 59-78 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract Traditional, two-tailed measurements of risk-adjusted performance, particularly the Sharpe ratio, give dangerous guidance during bear markets because they implicitly assume that returns are normally distributed and because they effectively treat upside and downside volatility as equal constituents of risk.1 The danger in assuming symmetry in the distribution of returns is neither new nor mysterious. Many of the architects of modern portfolio theory nevertheless adopted this statistical shortcut in grudging acceptance of that era’s computational limitations.2 Harry Markowitz’s theoretical call “for calculating the covariances of every security” initially posed a “monumental” barrier to practical implementation: under the constraints on computing power during the 1960s, “[c]alculating a single portfolio could eat up tens of thousands of dollars in computer time.”3
Keywords: Supra Note; Systematic Risk; Portfolio Selection; Sharpe Ratio; Capital Asset Price Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:qpochp:978-1-137-54464-3_5
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137544643
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-54464-3_5
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Quantitative Perspectives on Behavioral Economics and Finance from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().