One and a Half Cheers for Provident Funds in Malaysia and Singapore

M Ramesh

Chapter 8 in Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia, 2005, pp 191-208 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Malaysia and Singapore have had provident funds (PF) since long before the `individual retirement savings account’ (IRSA) became popular in policy dis-cussions following the publication of the World Bank’s Averting the Old Age Crisis (1994). The PF is similar to the IRSA in every respect except that it is centrally managed by the government rather than by private managers. Otherwise, both are compulsory defined contribution arrangements which specify the level of contribution rather than the benefits more typical of social insurance arrangements. Both are also fully funded in the sense that members’ benefit is equal to the balance in their personal account, imposing no actual or accrued liability on the government. The distinction is not firm in practice, however, as the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) launched in 2000 in Hong Kong is an IRSA in all but the name.

Keywords: Contribution Rate; Provident Fund; Life Annuity; Income Maintenance; Singapore Government (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:sopchp:978-0-230-52366-1_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230523661

DOI: 10.1057/9780230523661_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Social Policy in a Development Context from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().