Seismic Faults in the European Union

Domenico Mario Nuti ()
Additional contact information
Domenico Mario Nuti: University of Rome

Chapter 27 in Collected Works of Domenico Mario Nuti, Volume II, 2023, pp 621-655 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Brexit is generally regarded as a possible step towards the disintegration of the European Union. Actually the EU crisis is much more serious: the Union has a series of fault lines, with its institutions and policies equivalent to tectonic plates sliding over each other and colliding. Currently there are at least a dozen fault lines crossing EU and European borders: Brexit, trade policy (e.g. Wallonia/CETA, TTIP), migrations, austerity, tax competition (e.g. Ireland/Apple), the tiny EU budget of 1% of EU GDP, the divergence of welfare policies, neglect of civil rights (Hungary, Poland), the ECB tied hands (with respect to the Fed, the BoE, BoJ), the recapitalization of banks, foreign policy (Russia, Ukraine, NATO), military policy (Libya, Syria, IS). Many of these faults are inter-connected. In principle, the virtual tectonic plates that constitute the European Union, unlike the real physical ones that are uncontrollable, should be subject to EU governance. The remedies to secure the EU entire system are available, in many cases even without amending the Treaties, but clash with the hyper-liberal design that has gradually perverted European policies, as well as with conflicts of interest between states, ideologies, welfare regimes, classes, bureaucracies, memories and expectations. Rebus sic stantibus, there is an increasing probability of an institutional earthquake that sooner or later will disrupt and destroy the EU: the only uncertainty concerns the date, unpredictable as for all earthquakes. It is essential to imagine, investigate and assess the likely consequences of an exit from the Euro and Europe, on the part of Italy and other Southern countries, because (1) they might be required to leave; (2) it should not be taken for granted that, in terms of present value, the large cost of leaving should necessarily be higher than the large cost of remaining; and (3) the exploration of large mutual costs of disintegration would strengthen the negotiating position of those seeking to reduce the risk of a catastrophic implosion.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:stuchp:978-3-031-23167-4_27

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783031231674

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23167-4_27

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Economic Transition from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().