A Note on an Antinony in Comparative Advantage

Emmanuel de Dios ()

No 198902, UP School of Economics Discussion Papers from University of the Philippines School of Economics

Abstract: This note points out that the pattern of trade predicted by the comparative advantage may or may not hold, depending on the initial distribution of endowments. A necessary and sufficient condition for the “perverse?case to occur in a pure-exchange economy is that the education in the value of consumption on the part of those who lose from trade exceed the increase in the value of consumption on the part of those who gain, where the evaluation is carried out at autarky prices. Examples are then presented which illustrate that the "antinomy" may occur even when there are only two goods and both are normal. The question then raised is whether the principles of comparative advantage can really be regarded as a purely positive proposition.

Date: 1989-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published as UPSE Discussion Paper No. 1989-02, February 1989

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:phs:dpaper:198902

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UP School of Economics Discussion Papers from University of the Philippines School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RT Campos ().