How we measure poverty underestimates its extent and depth

Edita A. Tan
Additional contact information
Edita A. Tan: UP School of Economics

Philippine Review of Economics, 2017, vol. 54, issue 1, 94-119

Abstract: The country’s official definition of poverty is based on a threshold income that fails to adequately account for nonfood needs and is unrelated to actual behavior and real choices facing households. The resulting underestimation of the extent of poverty and rate of poverty reduction gives a false sense of comfort to policy-makers. Other sources of data particularly those on nutrition, education, and housing corroborate the existing gap between reality and official measures. After a critical look at existing methods, this paper proposes alternative thresholds of absolute poverty, with special attention to housing, that may provide a more accurate picture of the incidence and extent of the remaining poverty in the country.

Keywords: poverty measurement; poverty threshold; absolute poverty; housing; education; nutrition and malnutrition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I24 I32 R31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://pre.econ.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pre/article/view/951/854 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:phs:prejrn:v:54:y:2017:i:1:p:94-119

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Philippine Review of Economics from University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HR Rabe ().