Fiscal Space for Investment in Agriculture—A Review of Taxes and Subsidies in Agriculture in Pakistan

Stephen Davies, Wajiha Saeed, Muhammad Saad Moeen, Tehmina Tanveer and Aamer Irshad
Additional contact information
Stephen Davies: Programme Leader, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP), and Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI
Wajiha Saeed: Research Analyst, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP)
Muhammad Saad Moeen: Research Assistant, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP)
Tehmina Tanveer: Research Analyst, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP)
Aamer Irshad: Chief, Food and Agriculture, Planning Commission of Pakistan

The Pakistan Development Review, 2016, vol. 55, issue 4, 873-887

Abstract: Despite agriculture’s importance in terms of its relationship to poverty and welfare of the poorest households, the government finds it increasingly difficult to find the fiscal space for budgetary allocations for agriculture and agricultural R&D. We hypothesise that expansion of expenditures on agriculture is possible in the short to medium run with a combination of re-allocations and new taxation. We argue that existing spending aimed towards the agriculture sector includes very large outlays on implicit subsidies that are largely unproductive. These costs include: subsidisation of gas for fertiliser plants, which approach Rs 48 billion in gas subsidies to fertiliser companies; the full costs of the infrastructure and operation and maintenance of the irrigation system, which amount to Rs 166 billion per year; and losses on wheat procurement, which have been about Rs 25 billion recently. On the taxation side, while agricultural producers are not currently liable to pay tax on income, they do however pay indirect taxes on agricultural inputs. Using a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), we estimate agricultural producer pay about Rs 61 billion, mostly from GST taxes on fertiliser. Using a Computable General Equilibrium model, we show that agriculture could contribute further with an income tax on agricultural income. With a “low-rate-wide-base” income tax of 15 percent on non-poor, medium and large farms, as much as Rs 130 billion could be raised, enough to cover, for example, a sizable portion of the operation and maintenance cost of the irrigation system.

Keywords: Agriculture; Fiscal Policy; Subsidies; Taxation; General Equilibrium; Social Accounting Matrix; Pakistan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D58 E16 H20 H22 H23 Q10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2016/Volume4/873-887.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pid:journl:v:55:y:2016:i:4:p:873-887

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Pakistan Development Review from Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Khurram Iqbal ().