Country Music: Positional Voting and Strategic Behavior
Pietro Battiston,
Marco Magnani,
Dimitri Paolini and
Luca Rossi
Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Abstract:
We analyze strategic behaviour with positional voting in the context of the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC). In the ESC, each country participates both as a candidate, by presenting an artist and a song, and as a voter, via jury members and televote, creating an ideal setting for the study of strategic voting. To determine the final ranking, the contest employs a modified version of Borda voting, where voters are prevented from voting for their country’s artist and song. Nevertheless, we find evidence of strategic behaviour among both industry experts (jury members), and televote. In both cases, voters tend to assign lower scores to close competitors of their country’s candidate. We compare strategic voting in the ESC semifinals, where little information on competitors’ strength is available, and strategic voting is more challenging, with the final, when more information has been revealed. Additionally, we investigate whether the intrinsic quality of songs or other external factors may explain our empirical observations, using data retrieved from Spotify and a specialized website. Beyond revealing that forbidding votes for one’s own candidates is not sufficient to eliminate strategic behaviour, our results underscore the crucial role of information provision, specifically the drawbacks of multistage voting procedures where information is revealed during the election. Overall, they highlight the main limitation of Borda voting as an alternative to plurality voting.
Keywords: Strategic voting; Positional voting; Eurovision Song Contest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D72 Z11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cul
Note: ISSN 2039-1854
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ec.unipi.it/documents/Ricerca/papers/2025-322.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pie:dsedps:2025/322
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().