The “Utilization Controversy”: Demand and Utilization in Alternative Theories of Economic Growth and Distribution

Michalis Nikiforos

No PKWP2508, Working Papers from Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES)

Abstract: This chapter discusses the “utilization controversy,” the debate on whether or not demand plays a role in the determination of the rate of utilization in the long run. First, it explains why utilization has a central role in the various theories of growth and distribution. Second, it examines the theory of utilization and explains how the standard model does not recognize a role of demand and outlines recent theoretical advancements that justify an endogenous-to-demand long-run rate of utilization. Finally, it examines different estimates of utilization. It argues that the Federal Reserve measure of utilization, commonly employed in the debate, is inappropriate to capture long-run variations in utilization. Other measures such as the Average Workweek of Capital or the National Emergency Utilization Rate are better suited. These estimates provide empirical support for a utilization rate which is endogenous to demand in the long run.

Keywords: Accumulation; Growth; Distribution; Utilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B22 D20 D30 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35
Date: 2025-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://postkeynesian.net/media/working-papers/PKWP2508.pdf First version, 2025 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pke:wpaper:pkwp2508

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jo Michell ().