A comparative analysis of the IFRS prototype standard and current climate-related disclosures by FTSE/JSE financials 15 listed companies in South Africa

Tapiwa Muzata ()

International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2025, vol. 12, issue 2, 28-57

Abstract: This study examines the disparity between current climate risk disclosure practices and IFRS S1 and S2 requirements, using the precursor Climate-related Disclosures Prototype Standard as a benchmark. A qualitative, cross-case analysis, and deductive coding approach on archival data of the largest 15 financial companies listed on the FTSE/JSE Financials 15 index, focusing on their 2020 sustainability reports is employed. Key findings underscore a prevalent trend: companies strategically non-disclose climate-related risk scenarios’ results and impacts on business models; they utilise non-economic disclosures, supported by impression management and minimal narrative disclosures; prioritise stakeholder legitimacy and reputation over disclosure of substantive information. This approach, reminisce greenwashing, reluctance to fully disclose climate-related risks, particularly through scenario analysis which exposes diverse CRRO outcomes. Proprietary cost theory might explain this phenomenon. A significant subset of examined companies exhibited distinct lack of disclosure in strategy, and matrices and targets reporting. Non-disclosure patterns have considerable implications of possessing potential to substantially impede climate change and hinder future capital formation. Failure to address identified disparities exacerbates financial risks, heightens reputational risks, impedes business continuity planning, and perpetuates short-termism regarding climate risks issues. Insights in the complex interplay between transparency, reputation, financial concerns, and legitimacy in sustainability reporting are provided.

Keywords: Climate change; Climate-related risks; Disclosure; IFRS S1; IFRS S2; Sustainability. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/62/article/view/4285/8623 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pkp:ijobem:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:28-57:id:4285

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Business, Economics and Management from Conscientia Beam
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dim Michael ().