Open Science and Reporting Animal Studies: Who's Accountable?

Jonathan A Eisen, Emma Ganley and Catriona J MacCallum

PLOS Biology, 2014, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-3

Abstract: : If being open means maximizing the number of people a paper can reach and minimizing the difficulties of re-using the information within it, then the release of all information associated with a paper is critical. For ethical reasons, high standards of reporting are extra critical in regards to animal research.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 01757&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001757

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().