All or nothing: No half-Merge and the evolution of syntax
Robert C Berwick and
Noam Chomsky
PLOS Biology, 2019, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-5
Abstract:
In their Essay on the evolution of human language, Martins and Boeckx seek to refute what they call the “half-Merge fallacy”—the conclusion that the most elementary computational operation for human language syntax, binary set formation, or “Merge,” evolved in a single step. We show that their argument collapses. It is based on a serious misunderstanding of binary set formation as well as formal language theory. Furthermore, their specific evolutionary scenario counterproposal for a “two-step” evolution of Merge does not work. Although we agree with their Essay on several points, including that there must have been many steps in the evolution of human language and the importance of understanding how language and language syntax are implemented in the brain, we disagree that there is any justification, empirical or conceptual, for the decomposition of binary set formation into separate steps.In response to an Essay by Martins and Boeckx, this Formal Comment by Berwick and Chomsky argues that a crucial step in the evolution of human language can now be pinpointed to the appearance of a single new, but simple, computational operation.
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000539 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 00539&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000539
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000539
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().