 What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?Peter C Gøtzsche, Jerome P Kassirer, Karen L Woolley, Elizabeth Wager, Adam Jacobs, Art Gertel and Cindy Hamilton PLOS Medicine, 2009, vol. 6, issue 2, 1-4 Abstract: : Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer. In a debate Peter Gøtzsche argues that ghostwriting in medical literature is scientific misconduct, Jerome Kassirer says more evidence is needed, and Karen Woolley and colleagues propose an explicit role for professional medical writers. Date: 2009 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pmed00:1000023 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023 Access Statistics for this article More articles in PLOS Medicine from Public Library of Science |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.