The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
Eric I Benchimol,
Liam Smeeth,
Astrid Guttmann,
Katie Harron,
David Moher,
Irene Petersen,
Henrik T Sørensen,
Erik von Elm,
Sinéad M Langan and
Working Committee Record
PLOS Medicine, 2015, vol. 12, issue 10, 1-22
Abstract:
Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/fil ... 01885&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001885
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Medicine from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosmedicine ().