EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after hospitalization for medical illness: A trial sequential and cumulative meta-analysis

Navkaranbir S Bajaj, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Arman Qamar, Kartik Gupta, Ankur Gupta, Harsh Golwala, Javed Butler, Samuel Z Goldhaber and Mandeep R Mehra

PLOS Medicine, 2019, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-15

Abstract: Background: The efficacy, safety, and clinical importance of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (EDT) for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of EDT in patients hospitalized for medical illness. Methods and findings: Electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 21, 2019. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting use of EDT for prevention of VTE. We performed trial sequential and cumulative meta-analyses to evaluate EDT effects on the primary efficacy endpoint of symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major or fatal bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The pooled number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one symptomatic or fatal VTE event and the number needed to harm (NNH) to cause one major or fatal bleeding event were calculated. Conclusions: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials, we observed that use of a post-hospital discharge EDT strategy for a 4-to-6-week period reduced symptomatic or fatal VTE events at the expense of increased risk of major or fatal bleeding. Further investigations are still required to define the risks and benefits in discrete medically ill cohorts, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and develop pathways for targeted implementation of this postdischarge EDT strategy. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42018109151. A meta analysis and trial sequential on the effects of post-hospital discharge treatment for venous thromboembolism reveals a reduction in subsequent fatal events, Mandeep Mehra and colleagues show.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002797 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/fil ... 02797&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002797

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002797

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Medicine from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosmedicine ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002797