Socioeconomic risk markers of leprosy in high-burden countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Julia Moreira Pescarini, Agostino Strina, Joilda Silva Nery, Lacita Menezes Skalinski, Kaio Vinicius Freitas de Andrade, Maria Lucia F Penna, Elizabeth B Brickley, Laura C Rodrigues, Mauricio Lima Barreto and Gerson Oliveira Penna

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2018, vol. 12, issue 7, 1-20

Abstract: Over 200,000 new cases of leprosy are detected each year, of which approximately 7% are associated with grade-2 disabilities (G2Ds). For achieving leprosy elimination, one of the main challenges will be targeting higher risk groups within endemic communities. Nevertheless, the socioeconomic risk markers of leprosy remain poorly understood. To address this gap we systematically reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, LILACS and Web of Science for original articles investigating the social determinants of leprosy in countries with > 1000 cases/year in at least five years between 2006 and 2016. Cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and ecological studies were eligible for inclusion; qualitative studies, case reports, and reviews were excluded. Out of 1,534 non-duplicate records, 96 full-text articles were reviewed, and 39 met inclusion criteria. 17 were included in random-effects meta-analyses for sex, occupation, food shortage, household contact, crowding, and lack of clean (i.e., treated) water. The majority of studies were conducted in Brazil, India, or Bangladesh while none were undertaken in low-income countries. Descriptive synthesis indicated that increased age, poor sanitary and socioeconomic conditions, lower level of education, and food-insecurity are risk markers for leprosy. Additionally, in pooled estimates, leprosy was associated with being male (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.06–1.67), performing manual labor (RR = 2.15, 95% CI = 0.97–4.74), suffering from food shortage in the past (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05–1.85), being a household contact of a leprosy patient (RR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.24–5.18), and living in a crowded household (≥5 per household) (RR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.14–1.67). Lack of clean water did not appear to be a risk marker of leprosy (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.65–1.35). Additionally, ecological studies provided evidence that lower inequality, better human development, increased healthcare coverage, and cash transfer programs are linked with lower leprosy risks. These findings point to a consistent relationship between leprosy and unfavorable economic circumstances and, thereby, underscore the pressing need of leprosy control policies to target socially vulnerable groups in high-burden countries.Author summary: Many cases of leprosy still occur in low and middle-income countries, with a considerable proportion of them leading to permanent nerve damage and visible physical deformities. Disease elimination can be achieved with a better understanding of the sociodemographic characteristics of those most affected by the disease and by targeting those with greater risk within endemic countries. To address this question, we reviewed all published studies evaluating the social determinants of leprosy in countries endemic for leprosy. We found 39 studies, most of them conducted in Brazil (i.e., an upper-middle-income country), India or Bangladesh (i.e., lower-middle income countries), and none in low-income countries. Our review found strong evidence that males, household contacts of leprosy patients, individuals living in crowded households, and individuals who suffered food shortage in the past are more affected by leprosy. Evidence also exists that increasing age, poor sanitary and socioeconomic conditions, lower levels of education, and food insecurity are associated with a greater risk of leprosy. Our review underscores the importance of improving living conditions and decreasing inequality in low and middle-income countries to achieve leprosy elimination.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006622 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 06622&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006622

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006622

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().