Comparison of World Health Organization and Demographic and Health Surveys data to estimate sub-national deworming coverage in pre-school aged children

Nathan C Lo, Ribhav Gupta, David G Addiss, Eran Bendavid, Sam Heft-Neal, Alexei Mikhailov, Antonio Montresor and Pamela Sabina Mbabazi

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2020, vol. 14, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: Background: The key metric for monitoring the progress of deworming programs in controlling soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) is national drug coverage reported to the World Health Organization (WHO). There is increased interest in utilizing geographically-disaggregated data to estimate sub-national deworming coverage and equity, as well as gender parity. The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) offer a potential source of sub-national data. This study aimed to compare deworming coverage routinely reported to WHO and estimated by DHS in pre-school aged children to inform global STH measurement and evaluation. Methodology: We compared sub-national deworming coverage in pre-school aged children reported to WHO and estimated by DHS aligned geospatially and temporally. We included data from Burundi (2016–2017), Myanmar (2015–2016), and the Philippines (2017) based on data availability. WHO provided data on the date and sub-national coverage per mass drug administration reported by Ministries of Health. DHS included maternally-reported deworming status within the past 6 months for each child surveyed. We estimated differences in sub-national deworming coverage using WHO and DHS data, and performed sensitivity analyses. Principal findings: We compared data on pre-school aged children from 13 of 18 districts in Burundi (N = 6,835 in DHS), 11 of 15 districts in Myanmar (N = 1,462 in DHS) and 16 of 17 districts in the Philippines (N = 7,594 in DHS) following data exclusion. The national deworming coverages estimated by DHS in Burundi, Myanmar, and the Philippines were 75.5% (95% CI: 73.7%-77.7%), 47.0% (95% CI: 42.7%-51.3%), and 48.0% (95% CI: 46.0%-50.0%), respectively. The national deworming coverages reported by WHO in Burundi, Myanmar, and the Philippines were 80.1%, 93.6% and 75.7%, respectively. The mean absolute differences in district-level coverage reported to WHO and estimated by DHS in Burundi, Myanmar, and the Philippines were 9.5%, 41.5%, and 24.6%, respectively. Across countries, coverage reported to WHO was frequently higher than DHS estimates (32 of 40 districts). National deworming coverage from DHS estimates were similar by gender within countries. Conclusions and significance: Agreement of deworming coverage reported to WHO and estimated by DHS data was heterogeneous across countries, varying from broadly compatible in Burundi to largely discrepant in Myanmar. DHS data could complement deworming data reported to WHO to improve data monitoring practices and serve as an independent sub-national source of coverage data. Author summary: Soil-transmitted helminths are parasitic worms that infect an estimated 1 billion people globally, primarily in low- and middle-income countries. One of the main strategies to reduce the prevalence of these parasitic infections is through preventive chemotherapy—the periodic widespread treatment of an entire at-risk population (e.g. children) with albendazole or mebendazole. The World Health Organization (WHO) tracks the progress of mass deworming programs by estimating the national coverage of these programs through aggregation of local health district program reports, which represent the proportion of at-risk people in a country that are reported to have received deworming treatment. In this study, we used an alternative source of data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) that provides maternally-reported child deworming treatment to estimate coverage in pre-school aged children and was subsequently compared to data reported to WHO. We conducted this comparison of deworming coverage at a sub-national level for three countries with available data: Burundi, Myanmar, and the Philippines. Coverage reported to WHO and estimated by DHS were broadly consistent in Burundi, highly discrepant in Myanmar, and varied in agreement for the Philippines. These differences may be explained by variability in the medication distribution monitoring practices, quality of national validation systems, and mis-reporting due to albendazole receipt through non-STH related public health campaigns (e.g. lymphatic filariasis treatment). This analysis suggests that in specific settings, DHS data can complement deworming coverage data reported to WHO, serving as an independent source of high-resolution data to improve monitoring and evaluation of deworming programs globally.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008551 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 08551&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008551

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008551

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().