Performance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Arkasha Sadhewa, Ari Winasti Satyagraha, Mohammad Shafiul Alam, Wondimagegn Adissu, Anup Anvikar, Germana Bancone, Praveen K Bharti, Vinod K Bhutani, Santasabuj Das, Muzamil Mahdi Abdel Hamid, Mohammad Sharif Hossain, Nitika Nitika, Bernard A Okech, Lydia Visita Panggalo, Arunansu Talukdar, Michael E von Fricken, Ronald J Wong, Daniel Yilma, Ric N Price, Kamala Thriemer and Benedikt Ley

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2025, vol. 19, issue 3, 1-22

Abstract: Background: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the main risk factor for severe haemolysis following treatment with 8-aminoquinolines (8AQ). The World Health Organization recommends G6PD testing prior to 8AQ-based hypnozoitocidal treatment. Methods: We undertook an individual level meta-analysis of the performance of commercially available quantitative point-of-care diagnostics (PoCs) compared with reference spectrophotometry. A systematic literature search (PROSPERO: CRD42022330733) identified 595 articles of which 16 (2.7%) fulfilled pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, plus an additional 4 datasets. In total there were 12,678 paired measurements analyzed, 10,446 (82.4%) by STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, RoK, [SDB]), 2,042 (16.1%) by CareStart G6PD Biosensor (AccessBio, USA, [CSA]), 150 (1.2%) by CareStart Biosensor (WellsBio, RoK [CSW]), and 40 (0.3%) by FINDER (Baebies, USA, [FBA]). Findings: The pooled sensitivities of the SDB when measuring G6PD activity 96%) for all blood samples and G6PD activity thresholds. Irrespective of the blood samples and thresholds applied, sensitivity of the CSA did not exceed 62%, although specificity remained high at both 30% and 70% thresholds (>88%). Only one study each for CSW and FBA was included. Sensitivities of the CSW were 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.14) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.89) at the 30% and 70% thresholds, respectively (venous blood samples). Sensitivities of the FBA were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.29-1.00) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.19-0.99) at the 30% and 70% thresholds (venous blood samples). Specificities of the CSW and FBA were consistently high (>90%) at both thresholds. Accuracy of the SDB was higher in females at the 30% cut-off (OR: 3.49, p=0.002) and lower in malaria patients at the 70% cut-off (OR: 0.59, p = 0.005). Conclusions: The SDB performed better than other PoCs. More evidence was available for the performance of the SDB compared to other PoCs, giving higher confidence in its utility in diagnosing G6PD deficiency. Author summary: Malaria relapse from reactivation of the undetectable dormant liver stage parasite of Plasmodium vivax causes significant morbidity and mortality, and is a barrier to malaria elimination. The only class of drugs able to remove these liver stage parasites (8-aminoquinoline) are contra-indicated in patients with the inborn red blood cell disorder glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Testing for G6PD deficiency prior to 8-aminoquinoline prescription is recommended by the WHO. In this meta-analysis study, we collected data from published articles and other datasets of studies evaluating the performance of various field-based G6PD activity measurement devices and calculated the pooled performance of each device. The pooled analysis showed that one device, the STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, RoK), performed better at measuring G6PD activity compared to the others, although its accuracy may be impacted by the sex and malaria status of the patient. The device was also the most evaluated among the others.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012864 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 12864&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012864

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012864

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().