Customized Reference Ranges for Laboratory Values Decrease False Positive Alerts in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Oguz Kilickaya, Christopher Schmickl, Adil Ahmed, Juan Pulido, James Onigkeit, Kianoush Kashani, Ognjen Gajic, Vitaly Herasevich and Brian Pickering

PLOS ONE, 2014, vol. 9, issue 9, 1-5

Abstract: Background: Traditional electronic medical record (EMR) interfaces mark laboratory tests as abnormal based on standard reference ranges derived from healthy, middle-aged adults. This yields many false positive alerts with subsequent alert-fatigue when applied to complex populations like hospitalized, critically ill patients. Novel EMR interfaces using adjusted reference ranges customized for specific patient populations may ameliorate this problem. Objective: To compare accuracy of abnormal laboratory value indicators in a novel vs traditional EMR interface. Methods: Laboratory data from intensive care unit (ICU) patients consecutively admitted during a two-day period were recorded. For each patient, available laboratory results and the problem list were sent to two mutually blinded critical care experts, who marked the values about which they would like to be alerted. All disagreements were resolved by an independent super-reviewer. Based on this gold standard, we calculated and compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of customized vs traditional abnormal value indicators. Results: Thirty seven patients with a total of 1341 laboratory results were included. Experts’ agreement was fair (kappa = 0.39). Compared to the traditional EMR, custom abnormal laboratory value indicators had similar sensitivity (77% vs 85%, P = 0.22) and NPV (97.1% vs 98.6%, P = 0.06) but higher specificity (79% vs 61%, P

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107930 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 07930&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0107930

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107930

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().