Chronic pain patients can be classified into four groups: Clustering-based discriminant analysis of psychometric data from 4665 patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain centre (a SQRP study)

Emmanuel Bäckryd, Elisabeth B Persson, Annelie Inghilesi Larsson, Marcelo Rivano Fischer and Björn Gerdle

PLOS ONE, 2018, vol. 13, issue 2, 1-19

Abstract: Objective: To subgroup chronic pain patients using psychometric data and regress the variables most responsible for subgroup discrimination. Design: Cross-sectional, registry-based study. Setting and subjects: Chronic pain patients assessed at a multidisciplinary pain centre between 2008 and 2015. Methods: Data from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP) were retrieved and analysed by principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering analysis, and partial least squares–discriminant analysis. Results: Four subgroups were identified. Group 1 was characterized by low “psychological strain”, the best relative situation concerning pain characteristics (intensity and spreading), the lowest frequency of fibromyalgia, as well as by a slightly older age. Group 2 was characterized by high “psychological strain” and by the most negative situation with respect to pain characteristics (intensity and spreading). Group 3 was characterized by high “social distress”, the longest pain durations, and a statistically higher frequency of females. The frequency of three neuropathic pain conditions was generally lower in this group. Group 4 was characterized by high psychological strain, low “social distress”, and high pain intensity. Conclusions: The identification of these four clusters of chronic pain patients could be useful for the development of personalized rehabilitation programs. For example, the identification of a subgroup characterized mainly by high perceived “social distress” raises the question of how to best design interventions for such patients. Differentiating between clinically important subgroups and comparing how these subgroups respond to interventions is arguably an important area for further research.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192623 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 92623&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0192623

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192623

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().