Molecular epidemiology and clinical features of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- or carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia in Japan

Yuko Komatsu, Kei Kasahara, Takashi Inoue, Sang-Tae Lee, Tetsuro Muratani, Hisakazu Yano, Tadaaki Kirita and Keiichi Mikasa

PLOS ONE, 2018, vol. 13, issue 8, 1-11

Abstract: Objectives: To identify risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients with bacteremia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli, as well as to determine the prevalence and genetic background of such isolates. Methods: Case control study was performed with patients with E. coli bacteremia between January 2008 and May 2013 (n = 115) at a tertiary university hospital in Japan. Cases had ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC) whereas controls had non-ESBL-producing E. coli (non-ESBL-EC) isolates. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify risk factors and clinical outcomes. Isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, polymerase chain reaction analysis for beta-lactamase genes, and multi-locus sequence typing. Results: Of 115 unique cases of E. coli bacteremia, 30 (26.1%) were due to ESBL-EC and three (2.6%) were due to carbapenemase-producing E. coli. All three carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolates were IMP-6 and concurrently produced ESBL (ESBL/IMP-6-EC). ESBL-EC isolates showed multidrug resistance. Of the ESBL-EC isolates, CTX-M-27 was the most prevalent (33.3%), followed by CTX-M-14 (30%). Multi-locus sequence typing revealed that 19 (63.3%) isolates were ST131. The multivariate analysis identified nursing home-associated infections and antibiotic administration in the preceding 30 days as risk factors for ESBL-EC bacteremia. The 14-day mortality non-ESBL-EC, ESBL-EC, and ESBL/IMP-6-EC was 4.7% (4/85), 20% (6/30), and 66.7% (2/3), respectively. Conclusions: CTX-M-27, CTX-M-14, and ST131 were the most prevalent ESBL-EC isolates from bacteremic patients in a Japanese hospital. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to investigate the clinical significance of ESBL-EC and ESBL/IMP-6-EC.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202276 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 02276&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0202276

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202276

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().