Computational and experimental evaluation of the Tic-Tac-Toe RF coil for 7 Tesla MRI

Narayanan Krishnamurthy, Tales Santini, Sossena Wood, Junghwan Kim, Tiejun Zhao, Howard J Aizenstein and Tamer S Ibrahim

PLOS ONE, 2019, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-20

Abstract: A variety of 7 Tesla RF coil systems have been proposed to produce spin excitation (B1+ field) and MR image acquisition. Different groups have attempted to mitigate the challenges at high and ultra-high field MRI by proposing novel hardware and software solutions to obtain uniformly high spin excitation at acceptable RF absorption levels. In this study, we extensively compare the designs of two distributed-circuit based RF coils: the Tic-Tac-Toe (TTT) head coil and TEM head coil on multiple anatomically detailed head models and in-vivo. Bench measurements of s-parameters and experimental B1+ field distribution were obtained in volunteers and compared with numerical simulations. RF absorption, quantified by both average and peak SAR, and B1+ field intensity and homogeneity, calculated/measured in terms of maximum over minimum and coefficient of variation (CV) in the region of interest (ROI), are presented for both coils. A study of the RF consistency of both coils across multiple head models for different RF excitation strategies is also presented.

Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209663 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 09663&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0209663

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209663

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().