The balancing perspective of hard-to-reach hepatitis C patients who were lost to follow-up: A qualitative study

Patricia A M Kracht, Joop E Arends, Andy I M Hoepelman and Sigrid C J M Vervoort

PLOS ONE, 2020, vol. 15, issue 4, 1-12

Abstract: Background: In the foreseeable future, patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) with good healthcare access will all have been cured and the lost to follow-up (LFU) HCV-population will increasingly exist of hard-to-reach patients. Efforts to retrieve these individuals with HCV have been moderately successful so far. A deeper understanding of the reasons for loss to follow-up and the underlying processes is lacking. Aims: To explore reasons for previous loss to follow-up in patients with HCV who have been brought back into care. Methods: In 2017, fifteen patients with HCV who were evaluated at the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) Infectious diseases outpatient clinic as part of the “REtrieval And cure of Chronic Hepatitis C” (REACH)-project were included in this study through convenience sampling. Face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted and a qualitative analysis based on the grounded theory was applied. Results: A basic socio- psychological process named “maintaining the achieved balance” was uncovered in patients with HCV who were LFU. This “achieved balance” is the result of a transformative process following the initial HCV diagnosis. It is a steadfast stance in which participants keep HCV out of sight and in the margin of their lives in order to reestablish an optimal state of well-being. The balancing perspective is subsequently defended by repeated evasive behavioral patterns to avoid confrontation with the disease. Conclusion: The balancing perspective gives insight into why individuals with HCV were not retained in care but also why they remained LFU thereafter. Physicians should realize that this mindset can be persistent and repeated efforts may be needed to finally trace and retrieve these patients.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230756 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 30756&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0230756

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230756

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().