Stakeholder and end-user perspectives to refine the Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ) to measure broad health

Mirte Boelens, Cheryl Roumen, Esther J Bloemen- van Gurp, John Dierx, Lenny Nahar- van Venrooij, Tim van Zutphen, Pien MR Christiaanse, Jaron Schnitzer, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle, Miriam JJ de Kleijn, Marja van Vliet, Jessica C Kiefte- de Jong and Marieke D Spreeuwenberg

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: Introduction: Broad health concepts are increasingly embedded in healthcare and other domains. Therefore, in a previous study, we developed and validated the Context-Sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ). The CPHQ is based on Positive Health, the Capability Approach and on perspectives of stakeholders and end-users, including those with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP) with the aim to validly measure broad health. Stakeholders and end-users were involved in the development process. However, professionals working in healthcare, welfare or policy domain were not sufficiently involved, while their perspective on how to measure broad health is needed to support broader applicability and acceptability. Objective: We aimed to refine the 32-item CPHQ for cross-domain use through focus group discussions (FGDs) with stakeholders across healthcare, welfare and policy domains, researchers, as well as patients and citizens, including those from a lower SEP, expert review and a member check. Methods: We conducted nine (FGDs) and one interview with stakeholders from healthcare, welfare, and policy domains, research, patients and (lower SEP) citizens (n = 76). An adapted COMET method analysis and qualitative analysis were used, followed by a member check to validate the changes. Results: Items were omitted, merged or added, leading to a refined CPHQ (28 items). Main themes guiding edits were 1) the importance of avoiding normative phrasing and including subjectively interpretable items, 2) prioritization of items reflecting aspects of experienced health (e.g., “I feel happy” or “I feel healthy”), 3) relevance of functionings. At the same time, views diverged on the inclusion and wording of items related to exclusion, political representation and sense of belonging. These items were subsequently discussed by the core group and evaluated using the predefined decision rules and qualitative feedback. Conclusion: The CPHQ refinement involved a wide range of stakeholders, including end-users. This led to a 28-item CPHQ to measure broad health. Future research in different populations and settings is needed to validate and possibly shorten the refined CPHQ.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330014 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 30014&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0330014

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330014

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().