Contribution of women’s preference to the overuse of caesarean sections: A propensity score matching analysis based on a multi-country cross-sectional survey, as part of the QUALI-DEC project

Camille Etcheverry, Ana Pilar Betrán, Marion Ravit, Charles Kaboré, Pisake Lumbiganon, Guillermo Carroli, Quoc Nhu Hung Mac, Celina Gialdini, Alexandre Dumont and the QUALI-DEC research Group

PLOS ONE, 2025, vol. 20, issue 12, 1-19

Abstract: Introduction: Maternal request for caesarean section has often been cited to justify the increasing caesarean section rates worldwide. However, we lack evidence on the impact of women’s preference for caesarean section on this dramatic tendency. Given the need to develop appropriate strategies to reduce unnecessary caesarean section, the objective of this study was to assess the association between women’s preference for caesarean section and its actual use, and to estimate the proportion of caesarean section associated with women’s preference for caesarean section in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam. Methods: A cross-sectional hospital-based survey among postpartum women was conducted in 32 hospitals (8 per country) between 2020 and 2022. We selected women with no potential medical indication for caesarean section among a random sample of women who delivered in participating facilities during the data collection period. We chose a propensity score matching approach, to compare the probability of giving birth by caesarean section between women who, late in pregnancy, preferred caesarean section and those who preferred vaginal birth. Results: A total of 1,827 low-risk women were included, of whom 10.4% preferred a caesarean section and the average caesarean section rate was 24.5%. The results show that, on average, preference for caesarean section increased the probability of having a caesarean section by 32% (CI 95% [0.23–0.41]; p

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339007 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 39007&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0339007

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339007

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().