PACT: A practice-driven predictive algorithm for customized transradial prosthetic socket design
Vishal Pendse,
Calvin C Ngan,
Elaine Ouellette,
Neil Ready and
Jan Andrysek
PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-24
Abstract:
Well-fitting sockets are crucial for successful upper-limb prosthesis use, yet current digital socket design workflows are not standardized and demand considerable clinician effort. In this study, we introduce the Predictive Algorithm for Customized Transradial Socket Design (PACT), which generates socket models from a 3D limb scan. It works by retrieving the most similar limb–socket pair from a reference library of prosthetist-designed prosthetic sockets and applying isotropic and anisotropic scaling adjustments to match the input limb. To validate the algorithm, the PACT-predicted sockets for 19 participants were compared to their prosthetist-designed ones (the clinical “gold standard”) using the surface Euclidean (L2) distances, volume differences, and a 100-slice cross-sectional-area analysis. Localized discrepancies were mapped via signed-distance colorization and clustered with DBSCAN. PACT’s outputs differed from prosthetist designs by 2.11 ± 0.51 mm on the surface and 2.74 ± 2.56% in volume on average; slice-wise area differences were within ±10% for most of the socket length, with larger errors near the proximal trimline and distal tip. Recurrent localized discrepancies were found to be concentrated at the anterior-distal trimline (15/19 cases) and anterior–posterior compression (11/19 cases), indicating clear targets for rule-based or measurement-informed refinements. Subgroup patterns suggested an age-related bias (undersizing in pediatric, oversizing in adults). Overall, PACT quickly delivers (13.2 ± 0.7 s) a first-draft transradial socket within commonly cited clinical fit tolerances. Focus on specific regions, along with metadata such as tissue stiffness, age, and clinician-led measurements, can improve personalization and generalizability in future iterations of the PACT.
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340831 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 40831&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0340831
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340831
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().