Task complexity in exoskeleton setup and takedown: Procedural steps and usability problems as predictors of deployment performance

Jessica Sanchez-Balandran, Alejandra Martinez Fernandez, Laura Tovar, Priyadarshini Pennathur and Arunkumar Pennathur

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 4, 1-30

Abstract: Occupational exoskeletons show promise in reducing physical strain in industrial work, yet their industrial adoption remains limited. For exoskeletons to be used when performing tasks in industrial settings, they first need to be set up, then fitted and donned, and finally doffed, disassembled and stored for future use. Exoskeleton setup and takedown procedures can significantly impact industry deployment, adoption, and use, yet we have limited knowledge of the complexities in setup and takedown procedures and the resulting deployment barriers. The goals of this study were to understand how task complexity (number of task steps, usability problems and part count) in setup and takedown of exoskeletons impact task completion time and success, and present barriers in deployment. Twenty nine participants completed setup (assembly and donning) and takedown (doffing and disassembly) of four exoskeletons. We measured task times, success rates, task complexity (task step counts, part counts and usability problems). Hierarchical task analysis and heuristic assessments were performed to assess task complexity. Setup tasks, especially assembly, took the most time and exhibited the highest failure rates, whereas takedown tasks were faster and more successful. Participant-level regression analyses (N = 397 observations) showed that number of procedural steps was the strongest predictor, accounting for 66.9% of variance in completion times (β = 0.374, p

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348001 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 48001&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0348001

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().