EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The prognostic value of the early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: A machine learning-based investigation of the MIMIC database

Jiyang Liao, Qianwen Xiang, Xingwang Chen, Long Wu, Houwang Chen, Zhijun Yao, Huachu Wu and Jianbo Lai

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 6, 1-20

Abstract: Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown inconsistent prognostic value in individuals with sepsis. This study aimed to clarify its ability to predict 28-day mortality via a machine learning-based analysis of a large ICU database. Methods: This retrospective analysis employed data from the MIMIC-IV database (v3.1). The Boruta algorithm combined with XGBoost was used for two-stage feature selection. Patients were stratified by NLR quartiles into three groups (low: 14.70). This study defined 28-day mortality as the primary outcome. Associations between the NLR and mortality were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression (progressively adjusted for demographic, clinical, and machine learning-derived features), along with restricted cubic splines. Sensitivity analyses included quantifying NLR feature importance via machine learning and performing subgroup analyses across clinical strata. Results: This cohort study included 4,376 patients with a 28-day mortality rate of 18.4%. Compared with the SOFA and SAPS II scores, the prediction performance of XGBoost was superior (ROC-AUC 0.875; 95% CI 0.854–0.896; PR-AUC 0.603). Although the NLR ranked 14th in SHAP-based feature importance, multivariable analysis confirmed its independent association with elevated mortality risk: 28-day (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06–1.27; p 45 years and those with SOFA scores ≤4 or SAPS II scores >29. Specifically, patients ≥65 years of age demonstrated a 17% increase in 28-day mortality risk (p = 0.019), and patients with a SOFA score ≤4 exhibited a greater than 20% elevated risk across all of the endpoints (p

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348676 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 48676&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0348676

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348676

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-07
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348676