Comparison of three emergency department triage systems among Thai medical students: A randomized three-period crossover simulation study

Jarupa Yaowalaorng, Thanin Lokeskrawee, Natthaphon Pruksathorn, Suppachai Lawanaskol, Jayanton Patumanond, Chanitda Wicha, Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee, Suwapim Chanlaor and Chawalit Lakdee

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 10, 1-18

Abstract: Introduction: In Thailand, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and Ministry of Public Health Emergency Department triage system (MOPH) are commonly used, whereas the Thai Rapid Initial Assessment and Grading for Emergency (TRIAGE) system has been newly proposed. Comparative evidence is limited. We compared correct triage as the primary outcome, with under-triage, over-triage, and completion time as secondary outcomes. Methods: We conducted a randomized three-period crossover simulation study at the Lampang Medical Education Center from October 2025 to January 2026. Fifth- and sixth-year medical students without recent standardized triage reinforcement classified 50 standardized patient cards per system in one of six sequences, with a one-week washout between periods. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to estimate between-system differences, with adjustment for period, sequence, and academic year. Results: Sixty students completed all periods. No significant overall differences were detected in correct triage across TRIAGE, ESI, and MOPH (63.2%, 64.5%, and 61.8%, respectively), or in under-triage (19.6%, 20.0%, and 18.8%). Among sixth-year students, correct triage differed significantly across systems (global P = 0.004), with higher adjusted probabilities for ESI and TRIAGE than MOPH. Over-triage differed across systems and was highest with MOPH (7.0%), followed by TRIAGE (5.7%) and ESI (4.9%). Completion time was longest with TRIAGE (32.8 minutes), compared with ESI (24.3 minutes) and MOPH (23.2 minutes). Conclusion: No significant overall differences in correct or under-triage were detected, but the study was not powered to establish equivalence. MOPH showed higher over-triage, Completion time was longest with TRIAGE. Generalizability to experienced clinicians requires further study. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) TCTR20260316003

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350690 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 50690&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0350690

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350690

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().